This comment reeks of someone who has not used Cursor, at least in 2026.

Please point to a video or example of some way that Cursor is remotely state of the art at anything...

Fully on Cursor at work and I love it over CC, OpenCode and Pi that I use for personal work.

Composer is very good, and these days after heavily using CC, Pi and Open code I am back with Cursor. "No moat or IP" is underrating it a lot.

CC on Deepseek is a moat.

But many do already own SSD and RAM that they can reuse.

This is not 2015.

Elizabeth is the only one I use frequently so I got them mostly wrong.

Technically, not an underground line.

And if it was, it'd be the Elizabeth Line line.

Nice name ;)

And how cheap it is

But that makes no sense - what are inference partner terms?

Here you go: https://x.com/Kimi_Moonshot/status/2035074972943831491

People need to seriously stop it with the whole reddit-esque Boston Marathon Bomber investigation-style low-info crusades. Its extremely unhealthy for both your own mental state and the state of discourse on the internet. Even if Cursor misbehaved (they did not): Your life is not materially changed whether they did or did not. Use it, or don't use it; these things are a matter that lies exclusively between Cursor and Moonshot.

Again, I was not questioning Cursor here, but inference partner terms makes no real sense and that is what I wanted explained.

It's also always easier to blame the LLM when the developer doesn't work with it right.

How is that relevant? Also, when you are behind you do give more usage