Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ok took 30 minutes to run some benchmarks on a AWS instance. I used a small instance run a simple Flask Hello World app with gunicorn (1 worker and 4 workers) and bjoern. Frankly I was not able to fund any speed difference between both the servers. Here is the gist of the benchmark results

https://gist.github.com/753998



> n. Frankly I was not able to fund any speed difference between both the servers.

That is because of this http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2037060


http://imilky.cn/blog/2010/12/2nd-python-wsgi-server-test/

Author of gevent commented on this guy's earlier benchmark test

http://imilky.cn/blog/2010/04/python-wsgi-web-server/


What about memory consumption?


Is anyone else confused by "1 worker and 4 workers"?


He did 3 benchmarks: gunicorn with 1 worker process, gunicorn with 4 worker processes, bjoern.


Well I run gunicorn in production with 4 workers so just wanted to give it a try. Also I chose to add network latency by doing it on amazon instance.


My guess is he meant 1 master & 4 workers.


results look promising. has anyone tried WSGI on mongrel2?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: