> Dr. Geier, who is a geneticist and an obstetrician, is not qualified to give a neurological diagnosis.
> Dr Geier's testimony is not reliable, or grounded in scientific methodology and procedure. His testimony is merely subjective belief and unsupported speculation.
> Because Dr. Geier has made a profession of testifying in matters to which his professional background (obstetrics, genetics) is unrelated, his testimony is of limited value to the court.
http://www.casewatch.org/civil/geier.shtml
> Dr. Geier, who is a geneticist and an obstetrician, is not qualified to give a neurological diagnosis.
> Dr Geier's testimony is not reliable, or grounded in scientific methodology and procedure. His testimony is merely subjective belief and unsupported speculation.
> Because Dr. Geier has made a profession of testifying in matters to which his professional background (obstetrics, genetics) is unrelated, his testimony is of limited value to the court.
And that's a court order.