Sorry if I'm being unclear, but I simply have an issue with their conclusions (and the article title), particularly since their article doesn't support it.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. An absence of evidence, plus noting the problem of the AV, is all that this article has.
The Ars Technica article [1] draws much better conclusions - "Samsung laptop keylogger almost certainly a false positive". It's a significantly more accurate conclusion than "Confirmed: Samsung is Not Shipping Keyloggers", given the data that we have at this point.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. An absence of evidence, plus noting the problem of the AV, is all that this article has.
The Ars Technica article [1] draws much better conclusions - "Samsung laptop keylogger almost certainly a false positive". It's a significantly more accurate conclusion than "Confirmed: Samsung is Not Shipping Keyloggers", given the data that we have at this point.
[1] http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2011/03/samsung-laptop-...