Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Then we need to fix the infrastructure so that the current generation of attacks don't work. To just say, "oh, well bandwidth is limited so there's always going to be an attack" is not useful. Think of ways you can structure the infrastructure so that it can do filtering further out, or detected spoofed connections, or detect anomalous request patterns. There are solutions, we need to find them and implement them, not just tell people not to do it or claim it's a "weak" attack. It's a strong attack if it takes minimal effort to cause maximal damage. In the real world, that's what matters. There's the idea that we're playing a game and that there are behaviors that are good form or bad form. However, when it comes down to it, what works is what works.


They can certainly protect against this but it's not a good idea.

I pay US taxes and I don't want the cia.gov site to be on the same type of hardware as say Google just to be DDoS "proof".

They shouldn't be connected with a 33.6 modem but to ask all sites to upgrade everything to prevent DDoS is insane.

Who could afford to start a web site if they had to lay out all of that cost?


Might that be another advantage of cloud computing? To spread the cost of DDoS defense infrastructure across many websites?


You'd still have to pay for all the computing time to remain available during the attack. Its probably not worth it to try to stay up in that kind of storm.


mentat, I wasn't saying don't protect ourselves against this. However, harnessing a big enough bot network you can always overcome these measures. Finding an exploit is different, and especially for financial institutions inexcusable to a certain level.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: