That wasn’t the initial question.

Shareholders clearly get paid commensurately with their ability to make wise investment choices. There’s nothing more equitable than that

What other outcome could or should there possibly even be?

So in your opinion CEOs', shareholders', and investors' compensations closely match their contributions, but 21-year-old college graduates' who make 300k are paid too much for their contributions? What yardstick are you using for measuring "contributions" here?