Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Perhaps you've not read any of the well written posts about the bill. Here is a start:

http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/dont-break-internet

And not that it's a means to basis your entire belief on, but look at the people opposing this bill, and what they have to say:

http://dq99alanzv66m.cloudfront.net/sopa/img/12-14-letter.pd...



The second paragraph of the stanfordlawreview.org link is pretty succinct:

"To begin with, the bills represent an unprecedented, legally sanctioned assault on the Internet’s critical technical infrastructure. Based upon nothing more than an application by a federal prosecutor alleging that a foreign website is “dedicated to infringing activities,” Protect IP authorizes courts to order all U.S. Internet service providers, domain name registries, domain name registrars, and operators of domain name servers—a category that includes hundreds of thousands of small and medium-sized businesses, colleges, universities, nonprofit organizations, and the like—to take steps to prevent the offending site’s domain name from translating to the correct Internet protocol address. These orders can be issued even when the domains in question are located outside of the United States and registered in top-level domains (e.g., .fr, .de, or .jp) whose operators are themselves located outside the United States; indeed, some of the bills’ remedial provisions are directed solely at such domains."




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: