Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A matter of opinion perhaps but I don't consider having emails that require action achieving "inbox zero" (even if they're not in your inbox).

I follow almost everything in this post except for the starring. Instead, I do the following:

* If an email requires action and it is fast, I do it now, then archive.

* If an email requires action but will take longer than a minute, I keep in my inbox (but read). I clear these emails out once per day.

* If an email requires action but I can't because I'm blocked by some outside factor (waiting on something for example), I use followup.cc and redirect it back to me in a certain amount of time, then archive. When it comes back to me, I use followup.cc again if I'm still blocked.



Thank you for the link to followup.cc. I've been looking for a tool/service like this for a while.


Ditto here (would just upvote but that's private now).


This reminds me of boomerang for gmail [1] followup.cc has the advantage that it isn't gmail specific.

[1] http://www.boomeranggmail.com/


Boomerang is a life-saver but its doubly wonderful when you practice inbox zero


Completely agree. Using starred emails as a to do list is not effective because you do not have an easy way to prioritise these actions.


Thanks for the heads up on followup.cc what a brilliant idea!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: