Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I would not go into lengths to call correlation an evidence. It can be taken as a clue for further investigation because it also does not deny causation.


It is evidence for causation, in the Bayesian statistics meaning of "evidence". The first article I linked explains the process in detail.


Thank you for the links.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: